Criminal Law Enforcement against Ratu Entok’s Religious Blasphemy by the North Sumatra Regional Police
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36232/ebl.v6i3.6646Keywords:
Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Penistaan Agama, Ratu Entok, Polda Sumatera Utara, UU ITEAbstract
This study aims to comprehensively analyze the implementation of criminal law enforcement in the religious blasphemy case committed by the social media celebrity Irfan Satria Putra Lubis, alias Ratu Thalisa, alias Ratu Entok, through the TikTok platform, and to identify the factors influencing the effectiveness of that enforcement within the jurisdiction of the North Sumatra Regional Police (Polda Sumut). The massive development of information technology has shifted patterns of social interaction into digital space, which on the one hand guarantees freedom of expression but on the other hand may trigger electronic information and transaction offenses containing ethnic, religious, racial, and inter-group (SARA) elements. Using a juridical-empirical legal research method with a statutory approach, this study examines the stages of law enforcement from the investigation level at the police. The results show that Polda Sumut, through its Cyber Investigation Directorate, has carried out its law enforcement function progressively and transparently through the naming of a suspect, arrest, and detention on suspicion of violating Article 45A paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, as well as Article 156a of the Criminal Code. This enforcement is influenced by five factors, namely the legal factor, law enforcement officers, facilities (digital forensics), culture, and public legal awareness. Firm criminal law enforcement can prevent potential conflict in the multicultural society of North Sumatra and also serves as a deterrent for social media users to be more careful.
References
Admin. (2024, October 6). Ratu Entok reported to the North Sumatra Regional Police
over alleged religious blasphemy. rctiplus.com. Retrieved from
https://www.rctiplus.com/news/detail/terkini/4549241/ratu-entok-dilaporkan-ke-
polda-sumut-atas-dugaan-penistaan-agama
Admin Antara. (2024, December 31). Ratu Entok indicted for spreading hate speech and
religious defamation. sumbar.antaranews.com. Retrieved from
https://sumbar.antaranews.com/berita/650258/ratu-entok-didakwa-sebarkan-
ujaran-kebencian-dan-penodaan-agama
Antara News. (2024, December 31). Ratu Entok indicted for religious defamation in the
viral case of telling Jesus to cut his hair. newsdetik.com. Retrieved from
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7710778/ratu-entok-didakwa-penodaan-agama-di-
kasus-viral-suruh-yesus-potong-rambut
DetikSumut, T. (2025, March 11). 34-month prison sentence for Ratu Entok in the viral
case of telling Jesus to cut his hair. detik.com. Retrieved from
https://www.detik.com/sumut/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-7816908/vonis-34-bulan-bui-
untuk-ratu-entok-di-kasus-viral-suruh-yesus-potong-rambut
Devita Vallensia. (2026). A juridical analysis of the crime of religious blasphemy through
TikTok and YouTube social media (a study of Decision Number
2771/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Mdn). Sangaji : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum,
10(1). Retrieved from
https://ejournal.iaimbima.ac.id/index.php/sangaji/article/view/6748/1661
Editor. (2024, December 31). Religious blasphemy case, Ratu Entok finally put on trial.
dnaberita.com. Retrieved from https://dnaberita.com/kasus-penistaan-agama-ratu-
entok-akhirnya-disidangkan/
Endah Fuzi Yatnih. (2024). The influence of social media on perception and criminal law
enforcement: The impact of social media on public opinion, legal process, and
criminal justice. EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW, 4(2), 77–84.
Equality Before The Law 201
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36232/equalitybeforethelaw.v4i2.451
Esa Lupita Sari & Lista Widyastuti. (2021). Unilateral judgment through social media in
perceptions of diversity and human rights. MAJALAH HUKUM NASIONAL, 51(2),
131–154.
Ismail. (2025, March 10). Entangled in a religious blasphemy case, Ratu Entok jailed for
2 years and 10 months. medan.inews.id. Retrieved from
https://medan.inews.id/read/567555/tersandung-kasus-penistaan-agama-ratu-entok-
dipenjara-2-tahun-10-bulan
Kifli, S. (2025). Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia against the negative influence of
cybercrime development. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum THE JURIS, 9(1), 182–188. Retrieved
from http://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index.php/juris
Limrogate Immanuel, et al. (2026). Legal responsibility of social media users for the
content they post. Journal of Law & Policy Review, 4(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/DOI:
10.34007/jlpr.v4i1.1167
MARIA MARAGARETA HUTAJULU & SRI ENDAH WAHYUNINGSIH. (2025).
Law enforcement against cybercrime in Indonesia under Law Number 1 of 2024
concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning
Electronic Information and Transactions for the crime of defamation. Ensiklopedia
Of Journal, 7(3), 90–105. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org/ojs-
2.4.8-3/
Masfan Naibaho, et al. (2021). Law enforcement by the Special Criminal Investigation
Directorate of the North Sumatra Regional Police against hate speech using social
media. Iuris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 441–454.
META JUNITA NABABAN. (2026). Law enforcement against the crime of religious
blasphemy committed through social media (a study of Polda Sumut).
PASCASARJANA UNIVERSITAS MEDAN AREA MEDAN.
Muh. Ali Masnun, et al. (2022). The contribution of the social sciences, education, and
law in realizing an Indonesian civil society in the global era (1st ed.; M. I. M. Ali
Imron, Ed.). Surakarta: CV. Pramudita Press.
Mulki Ulumuddin. (2017). Criminal liability of perpetrators of religious blasphemy on
social media under Article 156a of the Criminal Code and Law Number 11 of 2008
concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua:
Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(2), 218–240.
Nurul Firmansyah. (2012). Proceedings of the Rule of Law Conference and Dialogue:
Where is the Indonesian rule of law heading. Dialog Negara Hukum. Jakarta.
Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/31873809/Prosiding_Konferensi_Dan_Dialog_Negara_
Hukum_Negara_Hukum_Indonesia_Ke_Mana_Akan_Melangkah
Prabhaswara, S. (2023). A juridical analysis of the crime of fraud in the use of social
media. Jurnal Bevinding, 01(03), 62–80.
Putri, N. K. (2024, October 9). Profile of Ratu Entok, the social media celebrity who
became a suspect in a religious blasphemy case. liputan6.com. Retrieved from
https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/5743136/profil-ratu-entok-selebgram-
yang-jadi-tersangka-kasus-penistaan-agama
Reynaldo Gregorius Muaya, et al. (2025). The crime of religious blasphemy through
social media under Law Number 1 of 2024. Lex_Crimen, 14(3), 1–13. Retrieved
from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/66083/51455
Sadarman Hia, et al. (2024). Restorative justice efforts in the crime of defamation under
202 Equality Before The Law
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008
concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. JURNAL DUNIA
PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 1031–1055. Retrieved from
https://jurnal.stokbinaguna.ac.id/index.php/JURDIP
Sekar Balqis, et al. (2024). An analysis of Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal objectives
regarding the position of the Medical Dispute Resolution Panel in Law Number 17
of 2023 concerning Health. Sangaji : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum, 8(2),
315–326. https://doi.org/: 10.52266/sangaji.v8i2.3463
Simorangkir, A. W. T. (2026). Interview with the Head of Unit of the Cyber Investigation
Directorate of the North Sumatra Regional Police. Medan.
Sri Hadijah Arnus, et al. (2022). NETIZEN AGGRESSIVENESS AGAINST
RELIGIOUS CONTENT AND DIVERSITY ON FACEBOOK MEDIA.
Proceedings of International Conference on Da’wa and Communication, 74–86.
Jakarta.
Syifa Lulu. (2024, October 9). Ratu Entok arrested following religious blasphemy case
via viral video, asking Jesus to shave his hair]. disway.id. Retrieved from
https://disway.id/read/826943/ratu-entok-ditangkap-buntut-kasus-penistaan-agama-
lewat-video-viral-minta-yesus-cukur-rambut/15
Tiara Rahmawati, et al. (2022). Law enforcement against online fraud using the giveaway
modus operandi on social media platforms. PAULUS Law Journal, 3(2), 102–118.
Wakos Reza Gautama. (2024, October 10). Chronology of the Ratu Entok case: A social
media live stream ending in jail. suara.com. Retrieved from
https://www.suara.com/lifestyle/2024/10/10/221206/kronologi-kasus-ratu-entok-
live-di-medsos-berujung-bui#goog_rewarded
Widya Yuridika, et al. (2024). No viral no justice: A perspective of Soerjono Soekanto’s
theory of legal effectiveness. Widya Yuridika, 7(3), 513–522. Retrieved from
http://publishing-widyagama.ac.id/ejournal-v2/index.php/yuridika/
Willa Wahyuni. (2022, November 7). Motive and intent in criminal offenses.
hukumonline.com. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/motif-
dan-niat-dalam-tindak-pidana-lt6368c05bb7e1c/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggita Lubis, Junaidi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


