Criminal Law Enforcement against Ratu Entok’s Religious Blasphemy by the North Sumatra Regional Police

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36232/ebl.v6i3.6646

Keywords:

Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Penistaan Agama, Ratu Entok, Polda Sumatera Utara, UU ITE

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze the implementation of criminal law enforcement in the religious blasphemy case committed by the social media celebrity Irfan Satria Putra Lubis, alias Ratu Thalisa, alias Ratu Entok, through the TikTok platform, and to identify the factors influencing the effectiveness of that enforcement within the jurisdiction of the North Sumatra Regional Police (Polda Sumut). The massive development of information technology has shifted patterns of social interaction into digital space, which on the one hand guarantees freedom of expression but on the other hand may trigger electronic information and transaction offenses containing ethnic, religious, racial, and inter-group (SARA) elements. Using a juridical-empirical legal research method with a statutory approach, this study examines the stages of law enforcement from the investigation level at the police. The results show that Polda Sumut, through its Cyber Investigation Directorate, has carried out its law enforcement function progressively and transparently through the naming of a suspect, arrest, and detention on suspicion of violating Article 45A paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, as well as Article 156a of the Criminal Code. This enforcement is influenced by five factors, namely the legal factor, law enforcement officers, facilities (digital forensics), culture, and public legal awareness. Firm criminal law enforcement can prevent potential conflict in the multicultural society of North Sumatra and also serves as a deterrent for social media users to be more careful.

Author Biography

Junaidi, Universitas Battuta

Prodi Hukum

References

Admin. (2024, October 6). Ratu Entok reported to the North Sumatra Regional Police

over alleged religious blasphemy. rctiplus.com. Retrieved from

https://www.rctiplus.com/news/detail/terkini/4549241/ratu-entok-dilaporkan-ke-

polda-sumut-atas-dugaan-penistaan-agama

Admin Antara. (2024, December 31). Ratu Entok indicted for spreading hate speech and

religious defamation. sumbar.antaranews.com. Retrieved from

https://sumbar.antaranews.com/berita/650258/ratu-entok-didakwa-sebarkan-

ujaran-kebencian-dan-penodaan-agama

Antara News. (2024, December 31). Ratu Entok indicted for religious defamation in the

viral case of telling Jesus to cut his hair. newsdetik.com. Retrieved from

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7710778/ratu-entok-didakwa-penodaan-agama-di-

kasus-viral-suruh-yesus-potong-rambut

DetikSumut, T. (2025, March 11). 34-month prison sentence for Ratu Entok in the viral

case of telling Jesus to cut his hair. detik.com. Retrieved from

https://www.detik.com/sumut/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-7816908/vonis-34-bulan-bui-

untuk-ratu-entok-di-kasus-viral-suruh-yesus-potong-rambut

Devita Vallensia. (2026). A juridical analysis of the crime of religious blasphemy through

TikTok and YouTube social media (a study of Decision Number

2771/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Mdn). Sangaji : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum,

10(1). Retrieved from

https://ejournal.iaimbima.ac.id/index.php/sangaji/article/view/6748/1661

Editor. (2024, December 31). Religious blasphemy case, Ratu Entok finally put on trial.

dnaberita.com. Retrieved from https://dnaberita.com/kasus-penistaan-agama-ratu-

entok-akhirnya-disidangkan/

Endah Fuzi Yatnih. (2024). The influence of social media on perception and criminal law

enforcement: The impact of social media on public opinion, legal process, and

criminal justice. EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW, 4(2), 77–84.

Equality Before The Law 201

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36232/equalitybeforethelaw.v4i2.451

Esa Lupita Sari & Lista Widyastuti. (2021). Unilateral judgment through social media in

perceptions of diversity and human rights. MAJALAH HUKUM NASIONAL, 51(2),

131–154.

Ismail. (2025, March 10). Entangled in a religious blasphemy case, Ratu Entok jailed for

2 years and 10 months. medan.inews.id. Retrieved from

https://medan.inews.id/read/567555/tersandung-kasus-penistaan-agama-ratu-entok-

dipenjara-2-tahun-10-bulan

Kifli, S. (2025). Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia against the negative influence of

cybercrime development. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum THE JURIS, 9(1), 182–188. Retrieved

from http://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index.php/juris

Limrogate Immanuel, et al. (2026). Legal responsibility of social media users for the

content they post. Journal of Law & Policy Review, 4(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/DOI:

10.34007/jlpr.v4i1.1167

MARIA MARAGARETA HUTAJULU & SRI ENDAH WAHYUNINGSIH. (2025).

Law enforcement against cybercrime in Indonesia under Law Number 1 of 2024

concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning

Electronic Information and Transactions for the crime of defamation. Ensiklopedia

Of Journal, 7(3), 90–105. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org/ojs-

2.4.8-3/

Masfan Naibaho, et al. (2021). Law enforcement by the Special Criminal Investigation

Directorate of the North Sumatra Regional Police against hate speech using social

media. Iuris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 441–454.

META JUNITA NABABAN. (2026). Law enforcement against the crime of religious

blasphemy committed through social media (a study of Polda Sumut).

PASCASARJANA UNIVERSITAS MEDAN AREA MEDAN.

Muh. Ali Masnun, et al. (2022). The contribution of the social sciences, education, and

law in realizing an Indonesian civil society in the global era (1st ed.; M. I. M. Ali

Imron, Ed.). Surakarta: CV. Pramudita Press.

Mulki Ulumuddin. (2017). Criminal liability of perpetrators of religious blasphemy on

social media under Article 156a of the Criminal Code and Law Number 11 of 2008

concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua:

Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(2), 218–240.

Nurul Firmansyah. (2012). Proceedings of the Rule of Law Conference and Dialogue:

Where is the Indonesian rule of law heading. Dialog Negara Hukum. Jakarta.

Retrieved from

https://www.academia.edu/31873809/Prosiding_Konferensi_Dan_Dialog_Negara_

Hukum_Negara_Hukum_Indonesia_Ke_Mana_Akan_Melangkah

Prabhaswara, S. (2023). A juridical analysis of the crime of fraud in the use of social

media. Jurnal Bevinding, 01(03), 62–80.

Putri, N. K. (2024, October 9). Profile of Ratu Entok, the social media celebrity who

became a suspect in a religious blasphemy case. liputan6.com. Retrieved from

https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/5743136/profil-ratu-entok-selebgram-

yang-jadi-tersangka-kasus-penistaan-agama

Reynaldo Gregorius Muaya, et al. (2025). The crime of religious blasphemy through

social media under Law Number 1 of 2024. Lex_Crimen, 14(3), 1–13. Retrieved

from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/66083/51455

Sadarman Hia, et al. (2024). Restorative justice efforts in the crime of defamation under

202 Equality Before The Law

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)

Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008

concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. JURNAL DUNIA

PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 1031–1055. Retrieved from

https://jurnal.stokbinaguna.ac.id/index.php/JURDIP

Sekar Balqis, et al. (2024). An analysis of Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal objectives

regarding the position of the Medical Dispute Resolution Panel in Law Number 17

of 2023 concerning Health. Sangaji : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum, 8(2),

315–326. https://doi.org/: 10.52266/sangaji.v8i2.3463

Simorangkir, A. W. T. (2026). Interview with the Head of Unit of the Cyber Investigation

Directorate of the North Sumatra Regional Police. Medan.

Sri Hadijah Arnus, et al. (2022). NETIZEN AGGRESSIVENESS AGAINST

RELIGIOUS CONTENT AND DIVERSITY ON FACEBOOK MEDIA.

Proceedings of International Conference on Da’wa and Communication, 74–86.

Jakarta.

Syifa Lulu. (2024, October 9). Ratu Entok arrested following religious blasphemy case

via viral video, asking Jesus to shave his hair]. disway.id. Retrieved from

https://disway.id/read/826943/ratu-entok-ditangkap-buntut-kasus-penistaan-agama-

lewat-video-viral-minta-yesus-cukur-rambut/15

Tiara Rahmawati, et al. (2022). Law enforcement against online fraud using the giveaway

modus operandi on social media platforms. PAULUS Law Journal, 3(2), 102–118.

Wakos Reza Gautama. (2024, October 10). Chronology of the Ratu Entok case: A social

media live stream ending in jail. suara.com. Retrieved from

https://www.suara.com/lifestyle/2024/10/10/221206/kronologi-kasus-ratu-entok-

live-di-medsos-berujung-bui#goog_rewarded

Widya Yuridika, et al. (2024). No viral no justice: A perspective of Soerjono Soekanto’s

theory of legal effectiveness. Widya Yuridika, 7(3), 513–522. Retrieved from

http://publishing-widyagama.ac.id/ejournal-v2/index.php/yuridika/

Willa Wahyuni. (2022, November 7). Motive and intent in criminal offenses.

hukumonline.com. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/motif-

dan-niat-dalam-tindak-pidana-lt6368c05bb7e1c/

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.